|
||
| Blueprint for A Canadian Securities Commission |
Re: - Blueprint for A Canadian Securities Commission
Dear Mr. Crawford,
Allow me to introduce myself, I'm the immediate past president of the FCIDB
and responding to your letter February 17, 2007, originally addressed to Orville
Sleen, our then Executive Director.
As background, and on my watch, the executive committees have spearheaded the
evolutionary changes of a deposit broker/agent trade group into a Professional
Standards Organization. Going forward and within that orbit, a task force has
been charged with structuring an industry wide voluntary compliance and oversight
regime. Furthermore, in response to marketplace neglect, we had orchestrated
a successful public campaign to move the government of the day into raising
Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit protection limit to its present
level of $100,000.00.
The FCIDB membership is composed of some 80 plus independent financial firms
and their respective representative financial advisors, - from home based local
trusted advisors through to large nation branded financial services groups.
The FCIDB is also unique in that 36 financial institutions also hold membership
and are represented at board level.
From inception, our founding members' modus operandi still resonates - in that
the clients' interest is the first objective.
That said, the advent and tsunami type of tidal wave of new rules and regulations
from the individual provincial securities regulators, self-regulatory provincial
and federal bodies (SROs), coupled with compliance requirements of such Acts
administered by FINTRAC and that of PIPEDA - all of which are interpreted or
in some instances misinterpreted through a plethora of institutions compliance
or legal departments - has created confusion and stress on our members and their
clients.
It's commendable that your imaginative treatment of the complex Canadian securities
landscape has been fashioned into a simple workable formula - congratulations.
However, it should be noted that the weight of all new and or added responsibilities
applied through licensing or agency contracts and agreements, has the individual
independent advisor - in my personal opinion, at the blunt end and by default,
ultimately accountable for all that ails the financial system as we see it today.
Moreover the trusted advisor relationship with the consumer is being strained
beyond any reasonable expectation of sustainable services levels, as profitability
benchmarks move higher to accommodate the aforementioned, the consumer is thus
marginalized, neglected or abandoned - this undesirable disservice needs to
be openly identified and remedied.
Moving forward, every effort should be made at the legislative or regulatory level to provide sufficient mechanisms, information tools, public awareness protocols and implementation and impact consultation with the advisor and the consumer.
To reiterate, we as an organization, and our individual independent deposit brokers members, wholeheartedly support your arguments for a principled based single regulatory body as found within other sophisticated financial capital markets.
Our single and foremost concern is that the impact of such fundamental change
will have an untimely impact on the consumer of such financial services or products,
and those trusted advisors will be sandwiched between legislative subsections,
otherwise known as the provable rock and a hard place - a significant aspect
easily overlooked when competing regulative institutions vie for marketplace
authority.
I thank you for your invitation and the opportunity to provide our support behind
this initiative.
Yours truly
David J. Newman
Immediate Past President
Federation of Canadian Independent Deposit Brokers
49 High Street, Suite 408-2
Barrie, On L4N 5J4
(705) 730-7599
C.C. Stephen Harper, Prime Minister, James M. Flaherty, Minister of Finance
including provincial and territorial premiers and ministers of finance and securities
regulators.